November 30, 2023

Alberta Sovereignty Act

Ask: Clarify the situation of Alberta's Sovereignty Act being used in response to the federal Clean Electricity Regulations.

Top line:

  1. Alberta's Sovereignty Act is part of a political campaign which will likely not have any long-term effect on the implementation of the Clean Electricity Regulations.
  2. Alberta's current focus is on supporting stranded energy company investments in the province and minimizing profit loss.
  3. Alberta generation is transitioning away from fossil fuels without regulations, but it is happening under private market mechanisms which are too slow to meet net zero 2050.
  4. Just transition is not possible under a market-mediated transition to clean generation, meaning the actions of the Alberta government will hurt communities and workers.

Summary

  • Alberta is picking fights with the federal Liberal government over the implementation of climate change-related regulation attempting to reduce Canadian emissions.
  • The Alberta Sovereignty Act is used as a propaganda tool in the provincial government's fight against progressive sounding laws at the federal level.
  • Alberta government officials (likely) know the Sovereignty Act cannot actually affect the implementation of federal electricity generation regulations.
  • Progressive lawyers have argued that many aspects of the Sovereignty Act are illegal or will result in illegal positions under Canadian law as it seeks to over-ride federal legislation.
  • Implementation of environmental laws that seek to force Alberta power generation to shift to more renewable sources is seen as an attack on Alberta's economic engine.
  • The federal government will have to go to the courts to force the Alberta government to stop interfering in the implementation of the law. This court battle is the goal of the UCP government, showing that the Liberals are interfering in Alberta's sovereignty.

Background Facts

  • The Clean Energy Regulations are still draft and consultations are ongoing.
  • Alberta does not have province-owned/Crown electricity generation companies.
  • Almost all of electricity in Alberta is generated by private generators on a semi-regulated free market/open trading price system. Only Ontario and Alberta have such a system for pricing electricity to fund generation in Canada.
  • A tiny fraction of generation is owned by Calgary and Edmonton where there are two large public distribution utilities (Enmax and Epcor).
  • Generation that is fossil fuel-based is allowed to be kept online under the draft Clean Electricity Regulations as a backup or support during times of peak-demand.
  • The current discussion around transition is about stranded private investment assets and private company profitability, not the ability to generate electricity from greener sources.
  • Alberta has a goal of turning-off coal generation by the end of 2023, six years ahead of the federal mandate showing that the private sector is quite willing to respond to regulations.
  • Natural Gas powered generation is the focus of the private-sector and UCP push back on net-zero transition as the majority of coal generation capacity has shifted to using Natural Gas.
  • Private generation companies are beholden to federal legislation on green electricity generation.
  • Alberta has adopted a motion to tell provincial regulators to not follow specific federal regulations.
  • The Alberta government has gone so far as to propose the establishment of a provincial state-owned company to secure the continued use of fossil fuel derived electricity generation. The government has suggested studying the ability for this Crown to act to shore-up profits of private provincial generation and provide some protection against federal fines.
  • The federal government has a large fund to fund the transition of private generation away from fossil fuels.

Background

Alberta's Sovereignty Act is mostly a propaganda tool used by the UCP government to attack federal (Liberal) legislation that works against the United Conservative Party's right-wing political narrative. The UCP's political narrative is that Alberta's economy is a target for progressives and should be defended against irresponsible economic policy which puts the interests of the environment (and future generations) ahead of private profits.

The Act's main purpose is to outline a way for the provincial government to debate any federal law the government sees as counter the interests of Alberta's economy.

The laws of Canada do not permit provinces to undermine federal laws and their implementation. I.e., you cannot make an action legal in a provincial law that has been deemed illegal federally.

Energy

The current battle Alberta's government has taken-up with the federal government is over the supposed clean electricity transition.

The federal government has adopted a 2035 date to essentially start the real transition to net-zero emissions by 2050. To meet this deadline, transition to a lower emitting electricity generation system is necessary well before 2050.

The federal government adopted a process on August 10, 2023, to bring Clean Electricity Regulations (CER) into effect in Canada. The purpose of the CER is facilitate discussions across Canada on moving Canada to reliable and affordable low-emitting electricity generation.

The goal of the draft regulations is to provide a clear timetable for transitioning their generation capacity towards renewable (including nuclear and hydro power) to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.

Not only will current generation need to transition to lower emitting sources, Canada will have to generate 2.35 times more electricity by 2050 under actual net-zero scenarios.

A minimum of $400 billion in investments will be needed nationally through 2050 to meet increased demand simply for lower emitting energy (1.4 times current demand for this scenario) while also undertaking routine maintenance and refurbishment.

84% of Canadian electricity is hydro, solar, wind, and nuclear.

For most provinces—together generating most of the electricity used in Canada—the Clean Electricity Regulations will have limited effect since most provincial regulators are already moving in this direction.

The central focus of this regulation is to support the move away from using Natural Gas by 2050.

However, the regulation will affect Alberta, Saskatchewan, and New Brunswick which still primarily rely fossil fuels for electricity generation and current governments have little interest in telling their generators to shift production.

/brief/img/Screenshot 2023-11-29 at 14-11-01 Alberta Clean electricity snapshot - Canada.ca.png
Alberta electricity generation. Coal generation is being transitioned to natural gas generation by 2024.

The transition to lower carbon generation will cost Alberta electricity generation companies a lot of money in both stranded assets and necessary new investments under high borrowing costs. Much of the reason for the high cost is the decision to delay the transition to lower-emission fuels.

Basic Legal Overview

Clean Electricity Regulations are being introduced to regulate emissions from electricity generation.

The Supreme Court of Canada when deciding on the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act confirmed that the federal government can regulate emissions through carbon pricing.

The progressive legal community and the government's lawyers are saying that this legislation is likely to be constitutional and within federal jurisdiction, particularly because it contains flexibilities when it is applied to emission targets for provinces and emitters.

The Sovereignty Act does not actually purport to oust federal jurisdiction or to expand Alberta jurisdiction.

The Act attempts the following:

  1. To declare by resolution that the legislature believes that a federal CER initiative is not constitutional.
  2. To make orders that are within provincial jurisdiction on actors in Alberta.
  3. Those orders cannot exceed provincial jurisdiction or over-ride federal jurisdiction.
  4. Any firm following such an order is still liable for breach of federal law if that law is constitutional.
  5. Re-states that where the Alberta legislature believes something, it can act within its normal area of jurisdiction. (This has the same legal effect as saying nothing at all, and just passing a law or making a decision under existing powers.)

However, the Act will result in is conflicting legal or policy directions for public bodies in Alberta and for private actors seeking to comply with all applicable laws (federal and provincial). This conflict will eventually lead to court proceedings to resolve any question as to jurisdiciton/legal status, and orders accordingly. It is this mechanism where the attempt is to slow down implementation of any applicable laws.

This seems to be new legal territory as it is hard to know how it will play out. However, if everyone is actually acting lawfully then the result will be CERs applying in Alberta which means natural gas generators will have to comply.

Analysis

The Sovereignty Act is the latest propaganda/campagin tool used by the United Conservative Party's (UCP) to support a narrative of Alberta fighting against the federal government's supposed overreach. The Sovereignty Act purpose is to support the passage of motions in the legislature to study and oppose the implementation of federal laws. The goal is to force the federal government to go to court to force the province to implement those laws and regulations.

The Alberta provincial government has routinely attempted to block implementation of federal laws and regulations that go against the stated interests of the United Conservative Party government.

In (almost) all cases the provincial government has failed to win cases against the federal government.

The focus on the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER) by the UCP is mostly about protecting the private sectors commercial interests in electricity generation. Almost all of Alberta's electricity is generated from private sources and almost all of that is Natural Gas derived.

The impact of the Sovereignty Act implementation will be a bolstering of right-wing critiques of how and how fast liberal and social democratic policy is driving transition away from fossil fuels. The language used is one of nationalism, but the Canadian conservative's goal is to force a more private market-mediated transition to low-emission energy.

A market-mediated transition is what Canadians have been experiencing over the previous 20 years. The result has been a lack of real movement towards sustainable energy generation to meet any commitments made by the Canadian government. A market-based transition has been one that delays the inevitable, increases the costs of energy transition, and inevitably bad for working Canadians.

At its foundation, the use of the Sovereignty Act by the UCP is part of the continued effort by private capital to avoid bearing the costs of moving to sustainable energy sources in a way that does not devastate workers and their communities.

Government language

From the government on how the CER would apply:

The performance standard would be 30 tonnes of CO2 per Gigawatt hour of electricity generated (“30 t/GWh”) as measured on an annual average basis. As a frame of reference, the best performing natural gas plants in Canada currently emit in the range of 350 to 420 t/GWh, and conventional coal units emit about 1,000 t/GWh.

  • on January 1, 2035, for all units:

    • that combust coal or petroleum coke,
    • that are commissioned on or after January 1, 2025, or
    • that increased their generation capacity by 10% or more since registration of the unit.
  • on the latter of January 1, 2035, or January 1 of the year in which the prohibition in subsection 4(2) of the Regulations Limiting Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Natural Gas-fired Generation of Electricity begins to apply to a “significantly modified” unit (a unit that has ceased burning coal).
  • for any other unit, the latter of January 1, 2035 or 20 years after its commissioning date.

This approach provides considerable lead time to provinces, while the 20-year End of Prescribed Life provision also helps minimize stranded assets.